Latest Blog Post

Friday, 21 October, 2022 - 01:31

This is the core of my contribution to a Nethope 2022 seminar at the invitation of Oxfam US.

 
The Abolition of Some Digital Technologies Is Essential to Human Development and Social Justice
 
a) Technology abolition is not only possible – it is commonplace
 
b) Technologies of all kinds are regularly abolished - and have een throughout history.
 
c) Abolition is not only common – it can be considered to be a measure of social progress
 
d) Every generation identifies new social evils and abolishes them
 
e) We are all familiar with many examples of abolition – historical and current
 
f) These include the abolition of technologies of production including child labour and, slavery; technologies of torture including the rack, pillory, breaking wheels and the instep borer; weapons technologies including, cluster bombs, nerve gas, and biological weapons; and industrial technologies that contained carcinogens or other toxic materials such as lead and asbestos.
 
g) Not only is abolition commonplace, and progressive, the methods for achieving abolition are well known and well established 
 
h) Abolition is achieved when citizens name injustices, build coalitions, raise awareness, influence political processes, reform laws and abolish social evils
 
i) When abolition is framed in this way as a feature of social progress, it then...

All Blog Posts

It's Not About the Technology Stupid!

I'm busy reading Kentaro Toyama's new book Geek Heresy.

Another Technology is Always Possible

Rui Roberto Ramos provided a fascinating case study at IFIP9.4 of ICT use by Recife City Council to impose control over informal street traders.

Is a Transformist ICT4D Possible?

Comment about ICT4D tends to be either celebratory hype or entirely negative criticism. Both extremes tend to be based on assumptions that are uncritical about exactly what we mean by development, as well as about the relationship between ICTs on the one hand and development on the other.

A Critical Look at Participatory Video

As you know participatory video (also known as PV) is the process of enabling non-experts to make films about (development) issues that they prioritise. Participatory video can be a way for disadvantaged communities to appropriate technology in order to take control of the way in which they are represented and to amplify local voices on key issues of concern to them.

Top ICT4D Conferences of 2015

As usual I have had a go at putting together a calendar of ICT4D conferences scheduled for the year ahead.

With many conferences still to announce details it already looks like a bumper harvest with May, as ever, looking to be the busiest month.

Talking about ICT4D: a typology

There's an interesting discussion going on within the civic-tech community about the lack of a common language for discussing the hugely diverse ways in which citizens are using technology to foster social change.

All ICT4D is Political

Emily Shaw wrote a great blog this week about 'Civic Tech', which, in case you have been living in a cave for the last year, is the new lingo for the field of 'citizen technology for social change'.

Lyon Declaration on ICT4D

The post-MDG Lyon Declaration on Access to Information and Development [pdf] is very welcome in that it represents a clear advance over the original Millennium Development Goal on ICT4D, but in my opinion the declaration does not go far enough in giving the most disadvantag

Keepod: a positive critique

Last week I got a call from mobile technology expert, and BBC Technology journalist Dan Simmons asking me to comment on the new keepod, an initiative that recently raised $40,000 on the Indigogo crowd-funding platform for their programme in Mathere, Nairobi.

Better Participatory Video Practice

I thought I had died and gone to PV heaven ...

 

ICT4D is Dead! Long Live ICT4D!

In a previous post I pushed back against James BonTempo's claim to have charted “The Slow Death of ICT4D”

ICT4D Masters Degrees Worldwide

Last week I had to do some 'quick & dirty' research online to work out whether the field of ICT4D was in its death throws as claimed by James BonTempo and Ken Banks or whether,

Pages